biographiesofFranzKafka

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

God vs Darwin? Three Questions for America by Ronald Dworkin (2006)

Posted on 22:02 by Unknown
In recent years a few religious scientists have claimed a refutation of the main tenets of Darwinian evolution that does not rely on biblical authority or the biblical young-Earth account of creation. This refutation purports only to show that an “intelligent design” rather than the unguided processes of random variation and natural selection that Darwin postulated must be responsible for creating life and human beings. The thesis has quickly gained enormous attention and notoriety. Several states have considered requiring teachers to describe the intelligent design theory as an available alternative to standard evolutionary theory in public high school biology classes. A Pennsylvania school board adopted that requirement a few years ago, and though a federal judge then struck the proposal down as an unconstitutional imposition of Christian doctrine in public schools,1 other public bodies in other states are still pursuing similar programs. President Bush recently appeared to endorse these campaigns: he said that “I felt like both sides ought to be properly taught.”2 The Senate majority leader, Bill Frist, who is said to covet the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2008, agreed. He said that teaching intelligent design theory along with evolution, as competing scientific explanations of the creation of human life, was fair because it “doesn’t force any particular theory on anyone.”3
If there is any scientific evidence against evolution, then of course students should be taught what it is. But the intelligent design movement has discovered no such scientific evidence at all. We must distinguish the following three claims. (1) Scientists have not yet shown to all their satisfaction how the Darwinian processes of random mutation and natural selection explain every feature of the development of plant and animal life on our planet; some features remain areas of speculation and controversy among them. (2) There is now good scientific evidence that these features cannot be explained within the general Darwinian structure; a successful explanation will therefore require abandoning that structure altogether. (3) This evidence also at least suggests that an intelligent designer created life and designed the processes of development that have produced human beings.
The first of these claims is both correct and unsurprising. The details of evolutionary theory, like the phenomena it tries to explain, are enormously complex. Eminent biologists disagree in heated arguments about, for example, whether some features of developed life are best explained as accidents or byproducts of no survival value in themselves. Evolutionary biologists face other challenges and disagree in how best to meet them.
The second of the three claims is false. It does not follow from the fact that evolutionary scientists have not yet found or agreed on a solution to some puzzle that their methods have been shown to be defective, any more than it follows from historical controversies or unproved mathematical conjectures that the methods of historians or mathematicians must be abandoned. Scientists have so far found no reason to doubt that the evolutionary puzzles can be solved within the general apparatus of neo-Darwinian theory that supplements Darwin with the dramatic recent discoveries of genetic biology. None of the rival solutions that scientists offer to the puzzles of evolution calls that general apparatus into question. The proponents of intelligent design theory claim in their lectures, popular writing, and television appearances that the irreducible complexity of certain forms of life proves that Darwin’s theory must be rejected root and branch. No element of certain even primitive forms of life could be removed, they say, without making it impossible for that form of life to survive. But their arguments are very bad, a judgment confirmed by their failure so far to expose these arguments to professional review by submitting articles to peer-reviewed journals.4 It is no explanation of this failure to suppose that the scientific establishment would reject even well-reasoned articles that challenged Darwin. On the contrary, a scientifically sound general attack on evolution would be very exciting news indeed: a Nobel Prize might be around the corner.
The third claim would be false even if the second claim were true. The proponents of intelligent design do not state explicitly that the designer must be a god—they try to avoid overtly religious claims in hopes that the constitutional bar to religious instruction in public schools would not prevent their theory being taught there—but that is the clear and unacceptable implication of their argument. If the failure to find a natural physical or biological explanation of some physical or biological phenomenon were taken to be evidence of intervention by a god who intended to bring about that phenomenon, science would disappear.
Science depends on the possibility of verification or falsification through positive evidence. There might conceivably be evidence that a superhuman power exists and has caused an otherwise inexplicable event. But the mere absence of a more conventional scientific explanation is in itself no such evidence. If it were, then we could postulate divine intervention in pursuit of some divine plan to explain anything we could not otherwise explain. Doctors have established a strong correlation between cigarette smoking and lung cancer, but they do not yet know the mechanisms through which one causes the other. Why should we not then say that an explanation is nevertheless at hand: that God punishes selected cigarette smokers in that way? Indeed, divine intervention would then be available even as a rival to a fully adequate conventional explanation. Why should we prefer a climatologist’s account of global warming, which suggests that the process will continue unless and until people reduce the level of their carbon pollution of the atmosphere, to the rival account that a god is warming the planet for his own purposes and will cool it again when he wishes?
Very few socially conservative Americans would vote for a school board that allowed teachers to explain anything they wished by citing a supernatural intelligence at work. The intelligent design theory appeals to some of them because it uses the idea of such an intelligence only to confirm the plausibility of the specific miraculous claims that are described in the Bible... read more:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2006/sep/21/three-questions-for-america/?pagination=false
Debate: 
Darwin and Spirituality: An Exchange  - Danis Rose, reply by Ronald Dworkin
In his essay [“Three Questions for America,” NYR, September 21] on the teaching of Darwinian theory and “intelligent design” in schools, Ronald Dworkin rightly condemns those scientific theories that are “dictated” by religious convictions. But he fails to notice that Darwinism itself is such a theory.
The scientific evidence is clear. Each human being is a blood relative of every known living organism on the planet, implying that all life derives from a common ancestor. For this to be the case there must have been a series of transformations of species, both progressive (advancing in complexity) and lateral (deviating in accidentals). The fossil record appears to confirm this, although it does not tell us whether the transformations were gradual or abrupt. Recent discoveries concerning the modular format of DNA suggest that the progressive transformations were typically abrupt. The extensive human experience of animal and plant husbandry (a particular interest of Darwin, incidentally) suggests that the lateral transformations were typically gradual.
If we turn now to Darwinian theory itself, which purports to explain these discoveries and which is taught in most schools and colleges in the developed world, we find that it is based on, as Darwin puts it, “the unguided processes of random variation and natural selection.” Take the first part: random variation. By random is meant, presumably, accidental, and clearly accidents do happen, but there is no scientific evidence to the effect that the transformations that took place in evolutionary history were always, or even typically, accidental.
The second unguided process, natural selection, is yet more curious. Let me propose, for an example, an alternative. One of the processes by means of which successful variations are selected is love, in all its varieties but in particular maternal love. An animal that is loved will survive, prosper, and reproduce. Love selects. If we take this idea to a Darwinist, however, he or she will say, no, what happens is that love is selected for: those animals that are loved will have an advantage over those that are not and, over time, will multiply, while the others, unloved, will die out. Thus, natural selection selects love. But therein lies the real scientific scandal of Darwinism: the effect is claimed to be the cause of the cause of the effect. Such an idea, when allowed, is immune to refutation... read more:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2006/nov/02/darwin-and-spirituality-an-exchange/?pagination=false
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Evolution, religion, science | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Media & police ducking the question of Hindutva terror
    From: The Hindu, June 10, 2013 Accusing sections of the media and the police of deliberately ignoring the issue of Hindutva extremism, journ...
  • Book review: The Frankfurt School at War - the Marxists Who Explained the Nazis to Washington
    Secret Reports on Nazi Germany: The Frankfurt School Contribution to the War Effort ,  by FRANZ NEUMANN, HERBERT MARCUSE, and OTTO KIRCHHEIM...
  • Books Reviewed: TWO NEW BOOKS ABOUT “BORGES”
    Few artists have built grand structures on such uncertain foundations as Jorge Luis Borges. Doubt was the sacred principle of his work, its ...
  • Karima Bennoune on Islamofascism in Algeria: Twenty years on, words do not die
    This year marks the twentieth anniversary of the Algerian jihadists war on culture. Those who waged the intellectual struggle against fundam...
  • Chris Hadfield's photographs of Earth from space
    During his 5 months in space on board the International Space Station, Commander Chris Hadfield has gained 790,000 followers on Twitter than...
  • Pravin Sawhney: Subtle Chinese ping-pong
    A Chinese border guards' platoon (40 soldiers) has pitched tents ten kilometres inside Indian territory overlooking Daulet Beg Oldie (DB...
  • Kabita Chakma: Sexual violence, indigenous Jumma women & Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
    There has been a high rate of violence against women all over Bangladesh in recent years. Kapaeeng Foundation figures for January 2007 to De...
  • Atheist Siddaramaiah and God's changing role in politics
    K. Siddaramaiah, a rare Indian politician who wears his atheism on his sleeve, took the oath as the next chief minister of Karnataka on Mond...
  • Child labour & low wages at Dutch seed companies
    Two Dutch vegetable seed companies in India compared * Combating child labour: active involvement makes the difference * Hazardous child lab...
  • The Act of Killing is being hailed by critics as one of the best films of the year
    'You celebrate mass killing so you don't have to look yourself in the mirror'  Joshua Oppenheimer went to Indonesia to make a d...

Categories

  • A K Ramanujan's Three Hundred Ramayanas (1)
  • Afghanistan (7)
  • Africa (9)
  • Ahimsa (17)
  • animals (2)
  • Art (4)
  • Astronomy (9)
  • Bangladesh (23)
  • birds (5)
  • Books and literature (40)
  • Burma (4)
  • CARTOONS (2)
  • censorship (33)
  • childhood (15)
  • China (23)
  • communalism (85)
  • corruption (24)
  • critical theory (34)
  • current affairs - India (139)
  • current affairs - international (51)
  • democratic protest (40)
  • Dilip's notes and articles (6)
  • ecology (36)
  • economics (23)
  • education (14)
  • energy (2)
  • Evolution (2)
  • films (3)
  • Global War and Violence (52)
  • history (81)
  • human rights (89)
  • Indian culture (13)
  • Japan (2)
  • justice (100)
  • labour matters (27)
  • media (26)
  • medicine (6)
  • Middle East (27)
  • mining (13)
  • music (2)
  • naxalism (20)
  • Nepal (2)
  • Obituary (6)
  • organised crime (30)
  • Pakistan (30)
  • Palestine / Israel (5)
  • Partition related texts (3)
  • philosophy (10)
  • Photos (16)
  • Poetry (2)
  • religion (23)
  • Russia (10)
  • Sampradayikta Virodhi Andolan (2)
  • satire (2)
  • science (20)
  • short stories (2)
  • Social networking (8)
  • Sri Lanka (2)
  • the human mind (36)
  • the oceans (6)
  • thinking about fascism (68)
  • Tibet (3)
  • women's rights (32)
  • Workers' movements (9)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (119)
    • ▼  June (133)
      • NAPM - People’s Commission Report on Special Rehab...
      • Pakistan — no country for foreign journalists
      • Nanga Parbat - Chinese mountaineer narrates dramat...
      • Sadiq Jamal Case: CBI Files Affidavit, Says Probe ...
      • Pakistan's 'blasphemy' girl moves to Canada
      • At the end of the day, you've given 110 per cent -...
      • UK's ancient forests could spread again thanks to ...
      • Amita Baviskar - Uttarakhand: For richer, but poorer
      • Tony Judt - The ‘Problem of Evil’ in Postwar Europ...
      • Cambodia's vast lost city: world's greatest pre-in...
      • Bahuguna kept eyes wide shut as Uttarakhand govt i...
      • German woman and son clear litter in Rishikesh // ...
      • Alexis Coe - The Nobel Peace Prize For Espionage. ...
      • Never the twain shall meet - Harris Khalique on Im...
      • Udisa Islam - Forced conversions in Bangladesh (Dh...
      • Gujarat Police killed Sadiq Jamal despite Intellig...
      • Seema Sirohi - Why US shouldn’t accept Dalrymple’s...
      • Jyoti Punwani - EVEN UTTARAKHAND TRAGEDY WILL NOT ...
      • माटू: उत्तराखंड से बर्बादी की रिर्पोट-1 - श्रीनगर ...
      • Statement on Uttrakhand Catastrophe by India Clima...
      • Vamsee Juluri - Hinduism and its Culture Wars
      • SABA NAQVI - The Dark Knights And The Dead Damsel
      • International Delegation Releases Report on Violat...
      • Probe larger conspiracy says Zakia Jafri's counsel...
      • Physicians for Human Rights - Using science & medi...
      • A lethal 'non-lethal' weapon - the growing market ...
      • Book review: Nobility in Motion: Nelson Mandela's ...
      • Alex Vatanka - The Guardian of Pakistan's Shia
      • Hooligans rule the roads in the name of Shab-e-Barat
      • Jyoti Punwani - Putting faith in the secular courts
      • God vs Darwin? Three Questions for America by Rona...
      • Moors murderer Ian Brady breaks his silence after ...
      • Brazil riots raise questions over sporting mega-ev...
      • China's Shenzhou-10 astronauts return to Earth
      • Cambodian tailorbird: A new species seen in Phnom ...
      • Air Force tribute to officers who died in Uttarakhand
      • माटू जनसंगठन - पुर्ननिर्माण हेतु अपील
      • Abheek Barman - Narendra Modi’s Himalayan miracle
      • Phone tapping - 90,000 cases in Gujarat intrigue c...
      • Narendra Modi 'warns' the CBI
      • MURTAZA HAIDER - Islam at war – with itself
      • MEREDITH TAX - Fundamentalism and education
      • Tufail Ahmad - The Next Decade of Jihadism in Paki...
      • Prasanta Chakravarty, Brinda Bose - The Confucian ...
      • BISHAL THAPA on Nepal politics: Vilifying Prachanda
      • Chitrangada Choudhury, Ajay Dandekar - Dealing Wit...
      • Karima Bennoune on Islamofascism in Algeria: Twent...
      • Saturn images from Cassini probe as it prepares to...
      • O3b space constellation to launch
      • Al Worden: ‘The loneliest human being’
      • Delhi court directs Raj Thackeray to appear before it
      • VIVEK KATJU - In Afghanistan, back to the future
      • The NSA's metastasised intelligence-industrial com...
      • Book review - Seeing reason: Jonathan Israel's rad...
      • Anger over violence against women in West Bengal s...
      • Brazil protests: How Ronaldo, Pele betrayed their ...
      • Public Appeal by R.B. SREEKUMAR, FORMER DGP, GUJARAT
      • Syria's lost treasure: How the civil war is ruinin...
      • 13 P.G. Wodehouse Quotes Guaranteed To Make Your D...
      • Brazil protests draw vast crowds - total turnout e...
      • British spy agency taps fibre-optic cables for sec...
      • Mihir Sharma - Tales of two riots
      • The Act of Killing is being hailed by critics as o...
      • Pambazuka News: Mobilising youth in Africa and the...
      • Death toll could multiply; Is this really a 'natur...
      • Ishrat Jehan's mother appeals for justice // CBI P...
      • YUDIT KISS - Letter from Tirana: Who is a guest in...
      • KHALID ANIS ANSARI - Muslims that ‘minority politi...
      • सत्यपाल डांग को याद करते हुए.. RIP comrade Satyapa...
      • Book review: Berkeley: What We Didn’t Know
      • Books reviewed: Pope Pius XII, Hitler’s pawn?
      • Cryptic Overtures and a Clandestine Meeting Gave B...
      • Cry for Help From China Labor Camp
      • Turkish police storm protest camp using teargas an...
      • Bomb attack destroys Jinnah's residency in Ziarat
      • Coal Scam: Congress MP Naveen Jindal faces CBI gri...
      • Babu Bokhariya, minister in Narendra Modi's cabine...
      • SACW Special on Taksim Square protests in Turkey
      • LAUNCH OF REPORT ASSESSING THE DAMAGE DURING THE A...
      • Media & police ducking the question of Hindutva te...
      • Kabita Chakma: Sexual violence, indigenous Jumma w...
      • Ishrat Jahan case: Gujarat High Court raps CBI ove...
      • Book review - Churning the Earth: The Making of a ...
      • Townshend and Daltrey: Quadrophenia's enduring rel...
      • Pacific island nation of Kiribati - in pictures
      • New Layer Of Human Eye,'Dua's Layer,' Discovered B...
      • Purushottam Agrawal - Why does the RSS hate the id...
      • Taksim, Convergence, and Secular Space // Turkey, ...
      • JOHN MILLS - The scale of debt in the western worl...
      • On 'terrorism' & the recent killings in the UK - b...
      • CBI Summons IB Special Director Rajinder Kumar In ...
      • Bharat Bhushan: If Modi takes power, it will be ab...
      • The Guantánamo Memoirs of Mohamedou Ould Slahi
      • German Soldiers React to Footage of Concentration ...
      • Seeing stars: Visions of the Universe exhibition
      • कर्णपुरा की कहानी...India's Coal Rush: Interview W...
      • Himanshu Kumar - They Are Not The “Others”, We Are
      • Mohan Guruswamy - Who lit the Godhra fire? (July ...
      • Racing Towards a Global Spring
      • Turkish riot police move into Taksim Square
    • ►  May (114)
    • ►  April (100)
    • ►  March (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile